“The Big Ten Makes a Power Move: Oregon and Washington Join, Shaking Up the Pac-12”

Another Blow to the Pac-12 as Oregon and Washington Join the Big Ten

August 4, 2023

On Friday, the Pac-12 Conference suffered a major blow as Oregon and Washington announced their departure to join the Big Ten. The move comes just a week after Colorado’s decision to jump to the Big 12, leaving the once-mighty Pac-12 with only four remaining schools. The conference’s future is now uncertain and its rapid decline raises profound questions about the impact of TV money on college football.

The Big Ten’s Journey to 18 Schools

The Big Ten, powered by the allure of TV money, has surged forward with its expansion, now boasting a total of 18 schools. The decision to welcome Oregon and Washington was unexpected, as there had been little interest in expansion until Arizona showed signs of leaving. Sensing an opportunity, the Big Ten proposed a deal that appealed to the discontented Northwest schools, ultimately leading to their departure from the Pac-12.

The Power of Television Rights

The ever-increasing influence of football’s television lucre continues to dominate college sports. Top conferences such as the Big Ten and the SEC rake in hundreds of millions of dollars solely from football television rights, with some schools earning enough revenue to cover their entire athletic budgets. The windfalls from TV money are disproportionately allocated to football, resulting in more lavish facilities, ballooning staffs, and amenities for athletes. While this reality benefits the football programs, other non-revenue sports and athletes bear the burden of conference realignment, which often involves extensive travel.

The Demise of the Pac-12

The fall of the Pac-12, though sudden, was years in the making. The conference’s former commissioner, Larry Scott, had initially secured a lucrative media deal that tripled its rights fees. However, his decision to launch the Pac-12 Network without the support of major partners such as ESPN and Fox turned out to be a grave mistake. The network struggled to secure distribution agreements, resulting in fewer viewers and diminished revenue compared to other conference networks. The Pac-12‘s inability to negotiate a satisfactory media rights deal as its rivals forged ahead ultimately led to the departures of USC, UCLA, and now Oregon and Washington.

The Challenges of Streaming and the Future of College Football

The Pac-12‘s proposed media deal centered on Apple TV, with streaming becoming an increasingly popular platform. While the deal appeared to offer a reasonable financial arrangement, concerns were raised about committing fully to a medium that may not be embraced by older fans and may not attract top recruits. The proposal’s structure resembled Apple’s previous deal with Major League Soccer, which saw the league reinvesting some of the revenue in its broadcasts. However, soccer’s international appeal, particularly with the signing of Lionel Messi, far surpasses that of college football. This raises doubts about whether Oregon State football, for example, could generate similar subscription sales.

Editorial: The Destructive Influence of TV Money on College Football

It is worth reflecting on the current state of college football and the role that television money has played in its evolution. While it has undoubtedly fueled financial growth and brought widespread attention to the sport, it has also given rise to a range of complex and troubling issues. The departure of Oregon and Washington from the Pac-12 is just the latest example of the destructive impact that TV money can have on the traditional landscape of collegiate athletics.

The allure of vast sums of money has prompted schools to make bold moves, often prioritizing short-term financial gains over long-standing conference affiliations and traditional rivalries. This has disrupted the equilibrium of college sports, causing conferences to splinter and schools to abandon their historical allegiances. The fallout from these decisions is felt not only by the schools left behind but also by the athletes, coaches, and fans who have invested their time, energy, and emotions in these programs.

Moreover, the excessive focus on football, driven by TV money, has distorted the priorities of universities and perpetuated an unhealthy imbalance between revenue-generating sports and non-revenue sports. While football programs receive exorbitant resources, athletes in non-revenue sports often face budget constraints, reduced opportunities, and increased travel burdens. The concentration of wealth in college football exacerbates disparities among sports and perpetuates an environment where financial gain reigns supreme.

The current situation raises important philosophical questions about the role of college athletics in society. Should universities prioritize financial prosperity above all else? Does the relentless pursuit of TV money undermine the educational mission of these institutions? And what impact does the commodification of collegiate sports have on the student-athletes themselves?

Advice: Seeking Balance in the Face of TV Money

The current state of college football necessitates a careful reevaluation of priorities and a renewed focus on balance. While it is unlikely that the influence of TV money will diminish anytime soon, there are steps that can be taken to mitigate its negative consequences and safeguard the integrity of collegiate athletics.

First and foremost, universities must prioritize the educational mission of their institutions. The pursuit of financial gain should not come at the expense of academic excellence and the well-being of student-athletes. Athletics programs should be viewed as an integral part of a well-rounded educational experience, rather than just a means to generate revenue.

Conferences should also consider the long-term implications of their decisions. While the allure of TV money may be enticing, it is crucial to weigh the potential consequences of conference realignment on the traditions, rivalries, and regional identities that make college sports so special. It is essential to preserve the unique character of each conference while also allowing for healthy competition and financial growth.

Lastly, there should be a renewed commitment to supporting non-revenue sports and providing equitable resources for athletes across all disciplines. The financial windfalls from football should be reinvested in a way that benefits all student-athletes and promotes the overall health and sustainability of collegiate athletics.

As we navigate the increasingly complex landscape of college football, it is vital to approach these challenges with thoughtful consideration and a commitment to finding a balance between financial prosperity and the well-being of student-athletes and the integrity of the game.

© 2023 The New York Times Company. All rights reserved.