As the July 17 deadline for Saquon Barkley and the New York Giants to reach a multiyear contract extension approaches, the two sides are still far from reaching an agreement. Sources say that the Giants returned to the negotiating table after the NFL draft to offer Barkley a smaller figure than the $13 million per year he previously rejected, but the amount of guaranteed money remains the primary sticking point.
Background
Barkley, one of the most talented running backs of his generation, is guaranteed to make $22.2 million over the next two years if he plays on the franchise tag this season ($10.1 million) and is tagged again next season at a 120% salary increase ($12.1 million). Most agents would use this total as the basement for guarantees. However, the unknown in all the reported offers thus far, including the initial one made last season, is the amount of guaranteed money included.
Philosophical Discussion
The Barkley-Giants contract negotiation is another example of the ongoing philosophical debate among NFL players, agents, and teams about how much guaranteed money a player ought to receive in a long-term contract. Barkley’s challenge is that he plays a position (running back) that bears a disproportionate amount of injury risk and is underpaid relative to its value.
Editorial
The Giants must understand the risks of being too stingy with guaranteed money in their negotiations with Barkley. For instance, if they insist on backloading an offer with essentially non-guaranteed “options” after the first two years, they risk alienating Barkley, thereby causing him to become more injury-prone or less productive on the field. A disgruntled Barkley could also make it difficult for the team to sign other top-tier players in the future.
Advice
While Barkley is motivated to secure a long-term deal that guarantees him more money than he would receive under the franchise tag, his easiest path to regaining the leverage lost under the tag will not materialize until after July 17. At that point, he can only play on the tag because further negotiations are prohibited. If he decides to push his absence as far as skipping the regular season, he may ultimately hurt his NFL career and lose potential earnings in the future. Rather than take that risk, Barkley should intensify his negotiations with the Giants, try to find common ground, and avoid the “worst-case scenario” of sitting out games.
<< photo by Allan Mas >>
You might want to read !
- “The Curious Case of Natalia Grace: A Must-Watch Documentary about the Dark Side of Adoption”
- Exploring the Thrills and Match-ups of Day 3 at French Open 2023: Order of Play and Schedule Recap
- Assessing the Potential Impact of Nick Nurse as the Philadelphia 76ers’ New Head Coach
- The Future of Saquon Barkley: Contract Negotiations and Team Dynamics
- The Growing Need for Stringent Safety Measures on Cruise Ships
- Exploring the Exciting Showdown Between Guadalajara and Tigres UANL: A Match Report
- “The Mysterious Case of Natalia Grace: A Fascinating Look into the Controversial Documentary”
- The Escalating Gun Violence: 9 injured, including children, in Hollywood Beach Shooting
- Erdogan’s Triumph: Implications for Turkey’s Democracy and Global Standing
- “The Economics of Golf: Analyzing the Payouts at the 2023 PGA Championship”
- “What led to the Yankees’ decision to DFA Aaron Hicks and sign Greg Allen?”
- “Ngannou lands new fighting deal with PFL: Will this move shake up the MMA status quo?”
- “The Significance of Memorial Day and Its Celebration in Duluth’s Parade”
- “The End of an Era: Reflections on the Legacy of ‘Barry’”
- How Lindsey Graham’s stance on Russia led to an arrest warrant from Moscow