On Thursday, May 19, 2023, during a televised Senate press conference, Democratic Senator John Fetterman wore a white Carhartt sweatshirt, grey workout shorts, and running shoes. The Pennsylvanian senator has a longstanding practice of dressing casually to political events, often donning sweats. However, he caught the attention of Colorado Representative Lauren Boebert, who criticized Fetterman’s fashion choice as “unbecoming.” Boebert argued that it was inappropriate for Fetterman to show up in casual wear while surrounded by his suited-up colleagues. Fetterman has not yet responded to Boebert’s comment.
Political Significance of Fashion
Politics and fashion have always been intertwined as fashion choices play an essential role in communicating one’s political personality. The way one dresses reflects their beliefs, values, and personality, and politicians are no exception. Their fashion choices serve as a political statement that communicates their persona and political stance.
Fashion is also used to signify authority. Formal attire generally indicates professionalism and seriousness. Hence, politicians who dress formally at press conferences or public events tend to convey a sense of power and confidence. In contrast, relaxed attire may be interpreted as a lack of seriousness.
Political Statements through Fashion Trends
In recent years, political fashion statements have become more prominent, with fashion designers incorporating politically charged slogans and symbols into their collections. For instance, during the 2016 US election, designer Marc Jacobs included a collection of politically charged T-shirts with slogans such as “Love trumps hate.”
Similarly, in 2020, the Black Lives Matter movement influenced fashion activism. Many designers and brands incorporated the movement’s message into their collections, with messages such as “Silence is Violence” and “Black Lives Matter.” This movement demonstrates how fashion can serve as a crucial tool for political participation.
Editorial: Fashion in Politics
At the heart of Boebert’s criticism of Fetterman’s casual attire during a press conference is a matter of respect for the position of a senator. Boebert’s claim is that Fetterman’s fashion choice appears unprofessional and a lack of seriousness, especially given the setting of the press conference.
However, Fetterman’s casual clothing has been a long-standing personal style that he has carried over to his professional life. Fashion is an expression of individuality, and in Fetterman’s case, it represents his affinity towards athletic wear and the working-class.
In conclusion, while fashion may not seem like a significant aspect of politics, it can tell us a lot about politicians’ personalities and priorities. However, it is essential to strike a balance between personal expression and upholding the position and authority of political office. Whether or not Fetterman’s fashion choice was suitable, it raised a meaningful conversation on how fashion represents an individual’s political stance.
<< photo by Tamara Bellis >>
